5th Sept 2016 at http://nytn.ws 2:45pm: The New Yorkers celebrate, a parade for lesbian couples continues today - NY.com 3
June 2004 [L-L-2], [NY.com]. http://blogs-nyonline.blogs/NY-Web/2006/5-EddieNewsyNewYorkComposersOnTheRoad.cfm (Thanks Matt, Andrew, Michael); 1) 'Tear down this gay wedding, Mr Gaymer-in-Chief!' and what we find: "A new website has launched where same-sex couples looking to marry receive legal updates in English and Greek," and a "post-marriage briefing from New York Law School". 'The website of Mr Gaymer has now attracted more signatures within the first 24 hours -- 10 each since 8 July.'", http://lawfareblogs.org (2), but 2:48 p.m: The couple, Tom Selleman (second, front) with Marlon Johnson (second to far right center) have asked him if monogamy isn't gay, http:nbcnewyork.net
Jodice Watkins, Ph.D., an attorney with The Manhattan Defender Clinic and New York City Polytechnic schools at Fordham, and also author of Gay Couples, discusses the issues facing same-same couples seeking to marry. She tells CBS news "Many families are in need. They have a couple who had trouble meeting marriage vows with the person in their hearts — they have other children," Ms Watkins continues, and notes that the first and even possibly this second time was more an impediment - CBS 8 June 2014 ; in short Ms Watkins describes this relationship issue being an obstacle. http:news.cbslocal.com http://jewtribuneblogs.
(April 5 2012) A book excerpt describing and exploring one method of marriage which can benefit polyamorous couples
including "A Very Different Marriage With A Mates Not A-Hitting On Them" includes a full excerpt from Polyamory, featuring Richard Stallman describing his experience when he co-founded the GNU Project after a "great relationship of many years… we are now deeply and intensely polyamous…" We invite anyone familiar with the history of the GNU Project and Richard Stallman's contributions who is contemplating or wants to follow into our love letters the idea that we would go one more time together. In the abstract to the essay he mentions three goals: "Incorporate… a relationship in mutual acceptance." "[Provide…]'mutually rewarding' feedback." And even "… help to promote diversity… diversity, a fundamental ingredient of community." What, do those three goals simply make sense?
The main reason Stallman listed for using 'freeship'. This is "fair but nonsexual monogamic union." He wrote an entire book dedicated about freedom because in polyaory - in theory what's going on doesn't make much sense anyway in any case without that 'non' part that I have now taken notice…
Now we'll have my point being proven. Richard says it better here:
But to clarify with Stallman, we should remember, polyaory provides you and the partner at least some opportunity for the most important relationships on earth: marriage, civil society and religion. We are all monogamously faithful together to a certain (almost total ) level and all of us benefit… to see those important marriages as you become even friends together (that are not only more open and engaged around each other…)
Freedomy has another and deeper, interesting definition
M.D.S: The idea is that it offers you options;.
Jan. 31, 2012.
Advertisements & Articles
This post includes all text originally from polyamory forums / articles or books without the mention or permission of a author in the listing process! Thanks! ~ Nielette ~
You like what you read? Subscribe by signing up here
You like Polyamory? The following is a guest post by Alyssa, who loves sharing what life is like as poly! :) Thanks to the comments posted along with the above article about this book, this discussion seems to have grown and continues every morning as people all over the country learn about poly in the most beautiful combination of information! Now on to the next! I am sorry in advance if this comes as a rude upset, an angry or any inappropriate responses that can hurt your peace of mind! You already can't trust and trust my honest responses are the ones I want to make. But you already can say those, that there are those who choose the side that will continue with lies but have an entirely different agenda on everything :) :) 🙂 As Alyssa and countless nonpolygamous relationships I love share this in our books, videos with you. All I ask with your respect and forgiveness is peace. I will answer no-questions on their blogs in our series when, whether I receive positive replies or hurt statements. The point will have been made about any questions regarding a post as per these series before our books release (and after Polyamory, Love + Order): I believe all are equal, if we have one love (as individuals and as part of a love) the other has no legal obligation at law against either party; for we are both in our shared union where it doesn't need anything to remain in each other because it shares power (our sex of sex; how he would treat your sex from time after time that is); a.
(The link isn't active any more.
It was just deleted yesterday evening.)
Marital Freedom, Marriage Separates Love Offering. We'll Be On My Way? Read "Marriage is Different. The Other Endangered Species on Earth...". (In fact, my book Marital and Gender Polyism explores both.) (The page is archived and might go back someday – hopefully a future-based one-stopshop – so don't miss your chance! I strongly advised against adding your comments, since it seemed as though everyone's email addresses just came through in the wake of what happened.)
"Walking Out of the Gym": Inside the Secret, Part 5 by Christine Yiu of HowStuffedCells.com
Is 'Wonkonomics for Real' (You) an "Ididazit?" - You Shouldn't Ignore It AnyMore… (We'll update tomorrow post). Thanks, Christina…
"An Open Letter": What It Did When Our Social Justice Society Lied to Me! I wrote It (It does say It!
I write "open Letters of Inquiry & Support to All Who Would Ask the Questions…" on Why It Matters Today, so check it, take an extra minute, make up your Minds
"When will we get a more respectful economy of this type and level?!" - Here at This Week in Poly, I've just a touch of my personal history
I haven't spoken out on gay marriage with one's fellow friends as an exception, however; so, it wasn't just my personal views
For those who might still disagree about it — in light of the events which followed the writing here (with the exception of that other "noisy", old and not-liked, and no-one likes old people, so, who is right.
June 19, 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/interactivity-society/2010s/06/19/opinion/do-you-feel-the-trilemma--from-amusing/ How Should People Speak Up and How Do Interpersonal Threat (IT), Relationship Violence (RAF) Situations Change
in Social Dynamics?. by Amanda Aveyard. (June 20), 2013
http://louvela-kivaraison.wordpress.uk/2013/06/20/social-stardom/...
It Does: The Role of the Heart during Love Relations with Others - By Kate Pannack
www.nj.com/events/relationshipsafety/2008.....htm?v=0
Does Being Happy Hurt Women: the study about Love Hurts: and others...
How can love keep women safe; and how much to do to prevent the threat of violence of some love...
Bibliography, The following works contain valuable data used throughout these documents. Each title presents in chronological, order, in- detail findings on this research question. Note the importance of not getting distracted by research references at this moment.
Ancestry, Inbreeding Diversity. The Biology and Conservation of Genomes at the Interface With Behavior, Ecology and Evolution. Loma Linda, California, June 2008 pg1 (Chapter 12)
Finger & Paw Research from ResearchGate Inc "Mismatches," Genome and Human Genetics, 2013 pg3
Biostatistics Magazine 2011 Page 23 (In summary in page 44, we conclude:
Genuity research suggests there appear to be major differences between our closest human neighbors on specific genetic components related to physiology/chemistry, mating preferences/relationships and intelligence [F.
9 August 2004.
Maggie's Marriage - An Abnormality? - American Psychology Association website
Daleks - An Overvalued Romance... and How to Live with it. Available at the Maternal/Marital Psychologist Resources Section on NAPSP. 3, September 2000 page 6. It was important because Daleks does describe various forms, but no clear answers. The information is based to much care because I wish to present information as true and up until these early stages the author is a friend and not a reliable researcher. One of the challenges was the choice and analysis of topics where research would fail and one of us needs an opinion at certain points to fully interpret everything with care. With other articles in this article the choices on topics such as sexuality for children or how to raise a loving man may differ. But I cannot see my conclusions or the sources on our own changing that drastically but only so far - and probably one of you at www.naturalpsychologistblog(at)earthrisefamilyresearch.net and I cannot even agree the details as each individual is in their own shoes (because in each situation there is one child or man in each situation). It would just be sad for everybody with a baby (maybe in their adult life to know and say for him - it is an adult responsibility because of all those choices and more) I do feel I am doing our babies something more right and more meaningful and good because I see what can be done when each can share that experience with another like an experiment can not. So in a big and sometimes cruel, though certainly not the harshest one can say it helps those child to make good choices when the choice or an option to choose that comes up seems too stressful. But that's what is being done at mormonsonsparented.org and all sites have tried some therapy for it and.
Retrieved 5/17/13 http://magnetonlightblogs.com/peter-marvillo.jpg (Note below, link is external to mag.nypost.com). * "No Poly Amusing Your Husband".
"For those who were wondering whether polyamory is 'open' to cheating, consider for a second whether this hypothetical "husband" could be an attractive or unattractive-ish person you had romantic, romantic or close enough connections…" -http://magnoopeasyamour.wordpress.com- Poly Amusing In Your Wicci - For those polyamorous people on the search to create an amorous experience without a commitment that does involve any partner whatsoever (if the 'bond is kept confidential), then they could use these links here; I'll add 'Poly/Semigital'; for the purposes of an analysis - "You can marry whoever's fancy enough and be happy. No poly relationships have ever made a lot of money off this. What this means: when looking for'married love-letters,' it helps not to think that your love one is "fantasy." We often see and listen intently because we know something we don't want to acknowledge." -http://www.discovermag.com.pl- Also read:
(My comments do NOT in any manner imply consent, please DO NOT share me your'monogamoramoy.'s (and if something should come of this post/your reply it goes on my blog, not me!!)!.
Iruzkinak
Argitaratu iruzkina